About a way to the publication of mathematics of new type



 All parties will benefit from the decision of an irrational task – as a result. I do not see new decisions in the field of cryptography. The irrational mathematics possesses efficiency in opposite area – in the field of real time. The new mathematics does not change position of religion in a society. The balance of a science and religion does not change. The science does the following step to strengthening the authority, but the belief becomes necessary. I do not speak about character of this belief. But I see practical value in religion. I see serious scientific achievements in religion history also.

 I predict restoration of authority of a science and other traditional institutes of a society. I investigate many themes in many branches – at level of base postulates. I do not see negative consequences.

 But I see transition period problems.

 The science solves technologies problems on a course of scientific and technical progress. I see prompt reduction of authority of all traditional institutes of a society, including authority of a science. I see the reasons of this phenomenon in the science itself. The science does not solve irrational problems of people and a society, but exacerbates them. The society reacts to strengthening of rationalization by means derationalization. The science recommends strengthening rationalization of society in the response to it. I see a cycle here.

 Not any rational behavior is correct. Not any irrational behavior is correct. The culture investigates models of irrational behavior, but the rational science wins against culture in progress race.

 We should correct such science. We should restore authority of culture. The science will work as a culture fragment.

 We cannot organize the honest analysis of a science in branches within the limits of open discussion. We will discredit the science in this way. I cannot publish a key for start of this discussion within the limits of the closed club even. I offer other decision. I see it in properties of irrational mathematics – in thermodynamic properties of space and time.

 We are capable to reduce entropy not only at the moment of a choice of the leader. We can use the systems approach. We can set the goals that we need. We can build future thanks to a thermodynamic arrow of time. I suggest using laws of the nature for management of the progress.

 I want to show an example of using of an inverse shoulder of an arrow of time – a shoulder with entropy reduction. I am planning publishing the decision … in future time.

 We should learn to operate progress. The successful decision of a problem in the final of the project is only a motivation here. We will solve the system of the most different tasks separately and in a complex. We will prepare all branches of knowledge and activity of the person for the decision of a key problem. We will reduce the entropy of an information field. We will follow the path of rationalization in this way. We will see the task of progress in the process of achieving result - in development, in movement.

 We can use the solvable or unsolvable key problem as the purpose. Principles of management of a progress will work in both cases.

 We can use the decision of an irrational task as the test mission. We can create the theory of management of progress and check up it in separate elements and in a complex on this example. Deficiency of trust in the possibility of a solution of an irrational problem on start of a project is not a problem here.

 I suggest solving an irrational task once again – with my help on a discussion course, but without my participation in a final step. We can implement one of three projects, for example: Inspiration or Schrödinger's cat or All inclusive.